- Advertising News
The Boston Blunder: A Lesson to Guerilla Marketing
by Surajit Sen Sharma
by Surajit Sen Sharma
Wrong positioning and target segmentation command the hub of almost all common marketing mistakes. Often, advertising people and companies forget two of the most important principles:
Today, in an information-rich environment, the chances of finding a committed consumer are lower, and the chances to lose one are higher than ever before. Advertising that creates a confusing perception of a product can fail to position itself properly within the consumer's search for perceived benefits. In fact, wrong target segmentation can keep the product from reaching the consumer altogether. In marketing attempts that fail from inadequate target segmentation or positioning, loss of immediate sales is usually the least of all woes. The actual losses play themselves out on many different dimensions.
Take, for example, the "Boston Blunder." Last January, a marketing company hired by the owners of the Cartoon Network put up a campaign to boost a particular late night program with a cult following. The advertising team put electronic advertisement boards across the country in nine major cities, depicting a cartoon figure of blinking lights with a "finger up" gesture. It was a creative guerilla marketing stunt. Only Boston city officials got a little more creative by shutting the city down for alleged bomb scares and poached the publicity that was meant for the cartoon characters. Despite the fact that the devices had been in the same spots for approximately two weeks, city officials claimed that the city had suffered a sudden nervous breakdown from the suspicious devices and that the monetary losses for the consequent closing down of the city was more than $500,000.
Recent history shows that city officials have suffered and reacted adversely toward guerilla marketing pranks in the past. In fact, the city officials of San Francisco charged a fine of $120,000 against IBM in 2001 for spray-painting "Peace, Love, and Linux" on city streets. Similarly, in 2002, Microsoft was let off the hook by the New York City Council with a mere warning and a $50 token fine for littering Manhattan with butterfly stickers. These instances, however, were more about breaking city rules than any failure in marketing strategy or tactics.
The drawback in the "Boston Blunder" was its target segmentation. The advertisement devices carried a symbolic message understood to any degree of coherence only by a closed niche market, but they were exposed to the gaze of an undifferentiated mass market. The targeted metropolitan crowd ranged across geographic, demographic, socioeconomic, and psychographic boundaries. It was definite that such uncategorized individuals would show great variation in their responses when perceiving a meaningless message. The advertisement boards contained glowing lights and wires; nothing to indicate their source or meaning. Considering the condition of a post 9/11 country continually shaken by the present "war against terror," the marketers could have avoided such a representation that did not deliver any plain meaning to the targeted masses, but instead, was open to panicky interpretations and served to alienate rather than assimilate.
The backlash of the failure in target segmentation included mass panic in Boston and the temporary close down of the city. City officials also accused two persons associated with the campaign of committing crimes. The advertisement agency and Turner Broadcasting (owners of the Cartoon Network) had to settle with government agencies to shell out $2 million to cover real and assumed losses, and the talented Jim Samples, head of Cartoon Network, had to resign from his job.
Still, the marketing program and the much-publicized backlash have not contributed to a significant rise in the number of viewers for the cartoon program. Considering that, the campaign took place in nine cities and the only negative reaction was in Boston. The consumer verdict on the campaign seems to be quite clear. Nothing fails like failure.
On the net:

Guerilla Marketing
www.gmarketing.com
Cartoon Network
www.cartoonnetwork.com
Turner Broadcasting
www.turner.com
- Only well-segmented markets show dependable reactions
- Customers consistently buy into perceived benefits—not the actual features of a product.
![]() | |
| + Enlarge | |
| The Cartoon Network's "Boston Blunder" is a direct result of wrong target segmentation. |
Take, for example, the "Boston Blunder." Last January, a marketing company hired by the owners of the Cartoon Network put up a campaign to boost a particular late night program with a cult following. The advertising team put electronic advertisement boards across the country in nine major cities, depicting a cartoon figure of blinking lights with a "finger up" gesture. It was a creative guerilla marketing stunt. Only Boston city officials got a little more creative by shutting the city down for alleged bomb scares and poached the publicity that was meant for the cartoon characters. Despite the fact that the devices had been in the same spots for approximately two weeks, city officials claimed that the city had suffered a sudden nervous breakdown from the suspicious devices and that the monetary losses for the consequent closing down of the city was more than $500,000.
Recent history shows that city officials have suffered and reacted adversely toward guerilla marketing pranks in the past. In fact, the city officials of San Francisco charged a fine of $120,000 against IBM in 2001 for spray-painting "Peace, Love, and Linux" on city streets. Similarly, in 2002, Microsoft was let off the hook by the New York City Council with a mere warning and a $50 token fine for littering Manhattan with butterfly stickers. These instances, however, were more about breaking city rules than any failure in marketing strategy or tactics.
The drawback in the "Boston Blunder" was its target segmentation. The advertisement devices carried a symbolic message understood to any degree of coherence only by a closed niche market, but they were exposed to the gaze of an undifferentiated mass market. The targeted metropolitan crowd ranged across geographic, demographic, socioeconomic, and psychographic boundaries. It was definite that such uncategorized individuals would show great variation in their responses when perceiving a meaningless message. The advertisement boards contained glowing lights and wires; nothing to indicate their source or meaning. Considering the condition of a post 9/11 country continually shaken by the present "war against terror," the marketers could have avoided such a representation that did not deliver any plain meaning to the targeted masses, but instead, was open to panicky interpretations and served to alienate rather than assimilate.
The backlash of the failure in target segmentation included mass panic in Boston and the temporary close down of the city. City officials also accused two persons associated with the campaign of committing crimes. The advertisement agency and Turner Broadcasting (owners of the Cartoon Network) had to settle with government agencies to shell out $2 million to cover real and assumed losses, and the talented Jim Samples, head of Cartoon Network, had to resign from his job.
Still, the marketing program and the much-publicized backlash have not contributed to a significant rise in the number of viewers for the cartoon program. Considering that, the campaign took place in nine cities and the only negative reaction was in Boston. The consumer verdict on the campaign seems to be quite clear. Nothing fails like failure.
On the net:
Guerilla Marketing
www.gmarketing.com
Cartoon Network
www.cartoonnetwork.com
Turner Broadcasting
www.turner.com
|
Popular tags:
benefits consumers details advertising Cartoon Network San Francisco principles reactions customers |
||||
|
Comments
article ID: 170003 http://www.advertisingcrossing.com/article/170003/The-Boston-Blunder-A-Lesson-to-Guerilla-Marketing/ article title: The Boston Blunder: A Lesson to Guerilla Marketing |
||
| Comment not found for this article. | ||
|
|
||
|
Related articles
|
|
Facebook comments: |
| Show Everyone What You Are Capable Of: Take Action and Investigate Jobs on 50,000+ Websites Instantly |
|
Get immediate results in your job search: Discover advertising jobs from over 50,000 websites on AdvertisingCrossing. It is not logical for you to be confined to advertising jobs on one website when you can have the exciting experience of searching over 50,000 websites at once. As a highly observant, fast paced and energetic person, you are resourceful and know that it is problematic that jobs are scattered on the websites of tens of thousands of companies, organizations and other job boards. By putting this tremendous variety of jobs in one place, we give you flexibility, and empower you to find the job of your choice. Our good-natured approach is one where we do not accept any money from advertisers for job postings; this allows us to provide you with unbiased research about every job opening. You are going to love the variety on our "advertising jobs only" site, the new people you will meet and the fun you will have as a result of taking the initiative and using us. |
|
Tell us where to send your access instructions:
|
|
total jobs on EmploymentCrossing |
| 3,506,994 |
|
new jobs this week on EmploymentCrossing |
| 786,322 |
|
job type count on AdvertisingCrossing |
|
Advertising Sales Jobs 1,135 Advertising Manager Jobs 808 Copywriter Jobs 699 Advertising Executive Jobs 589 Advertising Media Jobs 466 Advertising Account Executive Jobs 462 Advertising Director Jobs 459 |
| top 5 job searches |
| Get your risk FREE trial |
| jobs near you | |
|
International jobs Work at home jobs |
UK jobs Canada jobs |
|
New search feature using US map. click here
Looking for a new advertising job in your city? click here |
|
| Sign Up now | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||





