Law firm takes corporations to task for high 401(k) fees
By Lynn O'Shaughnessy
Recently, I received an e-mail from a partner at a law firm that would make most human resources directors sweat.
The e-mail came from Jerome J. Schlichter, whose law firm, Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, used to be known for its railroad personal injury cases. But that was before the firm got into a promising new source of litigation that offers more low-hanging fruit than a Sunkist orchard. Last fall, the firm began suing Fortune 500 corporations, contending that the employers are foisting 401(k) plans with excessively high fees on their unsuspecting employees.
Act Now! Activate a FREE three days trial to AdvertisingCrossing.com, because you know how important it is to know about all the jobs.
In a column last fall, I mentioned the class-action suits filed against such corporate Goliaths as International Paper, Northrop Grumman, Caterpillar, Bechtel Group, General Dynamics and Kraft Foods. Obviously, the corporate defendants have tried to squash the lawsuits. But on March 29, a federal judge in Illinois ruled against Kraft Foods, saying the workers' allegations "easily withstand scrutiny."
Companies, which have been blase about their 401(k) fiduciary duties, should be sweating. The legal skirmishes should only grow more fierce when trial attorneys begin seeing successes. But the momentum isn't only emanating from courtrooms. In a long-overdue move, the U.S. Department of Labor intends to require 401(k) providers and workplaces to improve their fee disclosure. What the government is especially keen on exposing is the indirect compensation generated from workers' accounts, which is essentially passed under the table by such 401(k) players as mutual fund firms, annuity providers, stockbrokers, insurance agents and workplaces.
Meanwhile, a congressional committee recently chaired by Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., carried this provocative title: "Are Hidden 401(k) Fees Undermining Workers' Retirement Security?" I'll give you one guess on what the committee concluded.
Nobody would be picking on corporations and the 401(k) industry if the stakes weren't so high. About 50 million Americans possess 401(k) accounts that collectively contain about $2.5 trillion. That sounds awfully impressive, but the average worker in the private sector has only socked away $28,000.
It's easy to see how American savers have been hoodwinked. When we witness a car wreck, we call 911. If our wallet is stolen, we call the credit card companies. When a 401(k) is gouging us, we ... oh wait, we do nothing. We don't get indignant because the financial hemorrhaging doesn't leave bloody shoe prints. To the naked eye, our 401(k) statements look as dull as an accountant's tie.
Part of the complacency can be attributed to this fact: You don't receive a bill for the costs that somebody is incurring for keeping your 401(k) up and running. Instead, the money is regularly withdrawn from your account, which certainly cuts down on people's curiosity about what's going on. And what's going on is this: The expenses passed along to workers can have absolutely no connection to what the costs actually are. One of the culprits is the bundled 401(k) phenomenon. A package of 401(k) mutual funds for a workplace is routinely assembled to generate so much money that it pays for the investment costs, as well as record keeping and other expenses.
Record keeping, however, is a relatively minor fixed cost that won't go up much every year. Yet as workers pour more money into their accounts, the money generated for this and other fixed costs can soar. A guy who has $100,000 in his 401(k) that charges 2% will pay $2,000 for the year, which will be $1,800 more than the guy in the next cubicle, who has only saved $10,000. And yet the services they receive are identical.
Workers, who are stuck investing in annuities within their 401(k) plans, are typically gouged even worse, and it's much harder to find out what the fees are because the insurance industry doesn't have to abide by the same disclosure rules required of mutual fund companies. Insurance fees are typically only revealed in annuity contracts signed by employers.
It's easier to grasp the 401(k) bamboozle by looking at a workplace example provided by Stephen J. Butler, the president of Pension Dynamics Corp., a 401(k) administrative firm, who testified before the House committee during its March hearing. He examined what the fees ideally should be for an engineering or other professional firm with 50 employees that has amassed $3 million in 401(k) assets. He estimated that the annual record keeping and compliance costs would break down to about $130 per employee. When you add in the actual cost of money management, the total plan's yearly cost would be $7,800. But the typical 401(k) vendor would charge this firm $36,500 and some providers would charge $60,000, which represents 2% of assets. It's the workers who are shouldering these outrageous fees.
Butler suggests that excessive fees over the past 20 years have reduced the average 401(k) account balance by 15%. As awareness of the 401(k) rip-off is beginning to reach workers, Schlichter's law firm appears to be spinning an even wider web. According to Pensions & Investments, a trade publication, the firm has used newspaper ads to encourage workers from other major corporations, such as Motorola, MetLife, AT&T, Bank of America and Merrill Lynch, to share their experiences with their own 401(k) plans. My suggestion to employers is to take a good, hard look at their workplace plans before somebody like Schlichter does it for them.
Lynn O'Shaughnessy is the author of "The Retirement Bible" and "The Investing Bible." She can be reached at lynnoshaughnessy@cox.net.
Mary , Philadelphia, PA
AdvertisingCrossing has a great number of jobs and that too at one place. Good work!
Georgia , Cheyenne, WY
I was very impressed with number of daily updates. There are an amazing number of jobs on the site.
Andrew , Plantation, FL
I thought the website was very comprehensive. I found a job quickly by using this job board.
Candice , Houston, TX
The same day I signed up I sent out some resumes online, and the next day I was offered an excellent career opportunity. This is the best site for professionals to find employment.
Julie , Chicago, IL
EmploymentCrossing is too good and very user friendly. The best feature is the submission of the resume and cover letter online. The search engines are also very fast.
To compare AdvertisingCrossing with other job sites
Show Everyone What You Are Capable Of: Take Action and Investigate Jobs on 50,000+ Websites Instantly
Get immediate results in your job search: Discover advertising jobs from over 50,000 websites on AdvertisingCrossing. It is not logical for you to be confined to advertising jobs on one website when you can have the exciting experience of searching over 50,000 websites at once.
You are focused on living in the present and not the future: Do not wait for the ideal advertising jobs to come to you; instead, find them right now. Observe, be practical, take action and get results today.
Ad Trafficker at MLB.com United States-NY-New York City
The Ad Trafficker will be responsible for implementing and managing processes and coordinating and providing support related to the Advertising-O...
Advertising is a profession that the majority of people consider to be fairly glamorous and high profile. However, the real attraction for people is the creativity that any role in the advertising industry demands from candidates. If you are looking for a way to enter the profession of advertising then you should know that there are a lot of advert...
EmploymentCrossing is the most convenient and user friendly job site that I have come across. It provides users with a truly user-friendly approach in their job search.
Aaron , Denver, CO
AdvertisingCrossing has a search engine that is really fast. It saves a lot of time.
Anna , Brentwood, TN
AdvertisingCrossing is a fantastic website, and provides a lot of opportunities.
See Every Advertising Job We Can Find on the Internet!
Unlike other sites, AdvertisingCrossing works for you and does not charge employers to post jobs and actually goes out and researches jobs for you. The jobs you see are the jobs we find for you and not the ones employers are paying us to post.
To compare AdvertisingCrossing with other job sites
Show Everyone What You Are Capable Of: Take Action and Investigate Jobs on 50,000+ Websites Instantly
Get immediate results in your job search: Discover advertising jobs from over 50,000 websites on AdvertisingCrossing. It is not logical for you to be confined to advertising jobs on one website when you can have the exciting experience of searching over 50,000 websites at once.
See all the jobs in your profession on the Internet in one place. Your powers of observation and people skills will all pay off when you can view:
Advertising jobs from every company employer career webpage we can find.
Advertising jobs from every professional advertising firm career page we can find.
Advertising jobs from every job board we can find.
Advertising jobs from every newspaper classified ad we can find.
Advertising jobs from every specialized advertising publication we can find.
Advertising jobs from every federal, state and local government career page we can find.
Advertising jobs from every public interest, nonprofit and other career page we can find.
Tell us where to send your access instructions:
Today at AdvertisingCrossing
231 - Jobs found in last 24 Hours1,699 - Jobs found in last 7 Days6,119 - Total Jobs Found
Your privacy is guaranteed. We will never give out, lease, or sell your personal information.
AdvertisingCrossing - #1 Job Aggregation and Private Job-Opening Research Service — The Most Quality Jobs Anywhere
AdvertisingCrossing is the first job consolidation service in the employment industry to seek to include every job that exists and not charge employers to post jobs on its site.
AdvertisingCrossing uses sophisticated technology and manual work to comb employer websites and other job boards for jobs and bring them all to its site.
